PUBLIC PREVIEW · FREE SIGN-IN FOR THE FULL PDF

Music subject report · November 2012

MusicSubject report2012November 2012

Full PDFs are free with an email account.

Resource overview

This subject report is listed under Music in the 2012 examination archive. The catalogue session is November 2012. The information below helps you identify the document before opening the complete PDF. Subject, year and session labels come from the archive catalogue; the original cover remains the reference if a label differs. A file is not automatically suitable for your current syllabus simply because its subject name matches.

For coursework research, read this document as a reference rather than a template to submit. Notice how the question, evidence and explanation connect. If a paired commentary or subject report is available, compare it with the original work instead of assuming a polished essay received a particular mark. Historical examples may belong to an earlier assessment framework.

The public preview contains file information and, where reliable text extraction is available, a limited opening excerpt. It is not a summary of unseen questions or a replacement for the original document. Create a free email account to read or download the complete file. No payment is required to unlock this archive resource.

This original usage overview is based on the archive metadata. It does not claim to summarise the complete file.

Opening excerpt

Partial opening-page text only. Opening text only, limited to at most 20% of pages, two page-equivalents and 2,200 characters. Clearly labelled personal identifiers have been removed. Text extraction may omit equations, tables or figures.

November 2012 extended essay reports Page 1 Music Overall grade boundaries Grade: E D C B A Mark range: 0 - 7 8 - 15 16 - 22 23 - 28 29 - 36 The range and suitability of the work submitted The essays submitted were mainly suitable. Several essays presented superb research and excellent realization. There was evidence of commendable preparation and supervision of the work of these candidates. A wide variety of topics were submitted for assessment this session. The majority had a defined line of inquiry and involved music study. Most submissions revealed special interest, independent work and commitment. In the communication, structuring and development of the investigations there were variable levels of effectiveness. Very few candidates pursued general, theoretical or tangential research questions that did not involve actual music. Candidate performance against each criterion Criterion A: research question Research questions were mostly music centered and well -formulated. The topics were not always reflected in the titles, the latter can be more specific. Sometimes the titles were imprecise even though the investigation was focused and specific. Some questions were too broad with too large a field of study (an entire composer’s oeuvre, or the impact of an artist on a genre, for example); the se generally did not support in-depth evaluation. Criterion B: introduction The introduction and abstract sections did not always fulfill their functions.
File information
Subject
Music
Document type
Subject report
Year
2012
Session
November 2012
Level
Not labelled in the archive
Paper
Not labelled
Examination zone
Not labelled in the archive
Language
English
File size
58 KB
Pages
3
FREE FULL RESOURCE

Read the complete document.

Register or sign in with your email to unlock the full PDF. No payment, password or membership is needed.

View full documentDownload complete PDF

Your link is valid for five minutes. You can request another link after signing in.

Tell us what you need.
CONTACT IBVIA

Let’s talk about your work.

Your enquiry: IB support

Continue to WhatsApp with your selected service already included. Add your subject, deadline and current draft in the chat.

For your first message

What are you working on?