PUBLIC PREVIEW · FREE SIGN-IN FOR THE FULL PDF

Film subject report · May 2016

FilmSubject report2016May 2016

Full PDFs are free with an email account.

Resource overview

This subject report is listed under Film in the 2016 examination archive. The catalogue session is May 2016. The information below helps you identify the document before opening the complete PDF. Subject, year and session labels come from the archive catalogue; the original cover remains the reference if a label differs. A file is not automatically suitable for your current syllabus simply because its subject name matches.

For coursework research, read this document as a reference rather than a template to submit. Notice how the question, evidence and explanation connect. If a paired commentary or subject report is available, compare it with the original work instead of assuming a polished essay received a particular mark. Historical examples may belong to an earlier assessment framework.

The public preview contains file information and, where reliable text extraction is available, a limited opening excerpt. It is not a summary of unseen questions or a replacement for the original document. Create a free email account to read or download the complete file. No payment is required to unlock this archive resource.

This original usage overview is based on the archive metadata. It does not claim to summarise the complete file.

Opening excerpt

Partial opening-page text only. Opening text only, limited to at most 20% of pages, two page-equivalents and 2,200 characters. Clearly labelled personal identifiers have been removed. Text extraction may omit equations, tables or figures.

May 2016 extended essay reports Page 1 Film Overall grade boundaries Grade: E D C B A Mark range: 0 - 7 8 - 15 16 - 22 23 - 28 29 - 36 The range and suitability of the work submitted There was a relatively wide range of work presented but of concern is the number of candidates wi th marks in the D/E boundary. Most of the essays were predictable responses to very commonplace topics. However, there were essays that reflected thorough knowledge and engagement with topics that were chosen with great care and thought. The best essays reflected intellectual flair enlivened by substantial research, mature analysis and a real understanding of the subject language required for a Film Extended Essay. A significant minority of the topics chosen were not sufficiently concerned with film. The candidates used film as a starting point to discuss other topics. In some cases topics classed as Film essays would have been more suitably classed as English Literature, Social Anthropology or History. This most frequently occurred when a candidate had not undertaken the Film course and when neither the student nor their supervisor were aware of what properly constituted an appropriate topic or appropriate research for film as a subject. Where suitable topics were chosen the most prominent weakness was the i nclusion of far too much superficial description or narrative summary. Many essays were written with the enthusiastic engagement of a film fan but lacked academic substance. Using appropriate film terminology and focusing upon how film constructs meaning
File information
Subject
Film
Document type
Subject report
Year
2016
Session
May 2016
Level
Not labelled in the archive
Paper
Not labelled
Examination zone
Not labelled in the archive
Language
English
File size
53 KB
Pages
4
FREE FULL RESOURCE

Read the complete document.

Register or sign in with your email to unlock the full PDF. No payment, password or membership is needed.

View full documentDownload complete PDF

Your link is valid for five minutes. You can request another link after signing in.

Tell us what you need.
CONTACT IBVIA

Let’s talk about your work.

Your enquiry: IB support

Continue to WhatsApp with your selected service already included. Add your subject, deadline and current draft in the chat.

For your first message

What are you working on?