This essay / exemplar is listed under Film in the 2015 examination archive. The catalogue session is May 2015. The information below helps you identify the document before opening the complete PDF. Subject, year and session labels come from the archive catalogue; the original cover remains the reference if a label differs. A file is not automatically suitable for your current syllabus simply because its subject name matches.
For coursework research, read this document as a reference rather than a template to submit. Notice how the question, evidence and explanation connect. If a paired commentary or subject report is available, compare it with the original work instead of assuming a polished essay received a particular mark. Historical examples may belong to an earlier assessment framework.
The public preview contains file information and, where reliable text extraction is available, a limited opening excerpt. It is not a summary of unseen questions or a replacement for the original document. Create a free email account to read or download the complete file. No payment is required to unlock this archive resource.
This original usage overview is based on the archive metadata. It does not claim to summarise the complete file.
Opening excerpt
Opening text only, limited to at most 20% of pages, two page-equivalents and 2,200 characters. Clearly labelled personal identifiers have been removed. Text extraction may omit equations, tables or figures.
then this cover and
and whether it is
international i::,acc,:11aurt~at,e, Peterson
Supervisor's ·· report Etnd. declaratkm
Th~ supetvisor; mt~t complete this.· report, sigh the declaration iend ihen give ·the .final.· v~rsioh of the· ~xte
EJ~~ay, with (his ccxver attached, to the [)iplon1a Programme coordinator: ' . .
.Name ofsupervisor ·(CAPITAL letters).c_
PJeasedOm'!?enf, as a/ijrop(iate, an the candidate's performance, t/ll;;t,,xt /n wn}t;; the c.ndidati, unde
theres~wch for the ext'fnded essay, any difficulties ericountered anq.t,ow these weq;: overcome (see page
· the .extend~d esstay guide).> The c8hch1ding interview. {viva . y9c(:]) · T~Y prBy.idr · ... u$e(ul infc)[·matiog,. t
commerts can help the exarrtiner award · a level for criterion K (holistic judgment). Do not comment on
ady~rse. persor113/ pircumsta;nces that may have affected the candidate/<lf. the amount of time spent with
.candidate was zero, y()µmustexplain this, inparlicul arhow ft was thep. possible to aµmentiqate the essayas .
. ··.··candidate's own work. You 111ay attachan additional sllfJ.ef if there isinsufficient space he.re. · ·
What most impressed me about this ess ay was the student 's very good
understanding of the wide variet y of nuance in voyeurism in film. The growth of
the essa y between original, somewhat superficial idea, the draft and the final
/ersion was enormous. This is because worked steadil y and
/ continuously over a long period of time to grapple with the films and the
concepts underlying them. He listened well to feedb ack given at the first draft. In
the viva voce, commented that the greatest amount of time was spent
juggling with the specific rese arch question and that it wasn't until nearly all the
research was done that he was able to organize his thoughts and anal ysis of the
two films in comparison . ThiJ ,is clear in t~e fi~al work, which is well .structured
and argued. The conclusio IJ,ireached denv e d1rectly from the analysis and
provide a thoughtful res ~Jnse to a comple x and sophisticated film theor y.
-vi'
Thi$ dec1arat1dn mu.st be stgnJd by the supervisor; otherwise a mar« oizerO will bf]issued.
\ . ,"·, ..... · ... '·
File information
Subject
Film
Document type
Essay / exemplar
Year
2015
Session
May 2015
Level
Not labelled in the archive
Paper
Not labelled
Examination zone
Not labelled in the archive
Language
English
File size
1.3 MB
Pages
27
FREE FULL RESOURCE
Read the complete document.
Register or sign in with your email to unlock the full PDF. No payment, password or membership is needed.