PUBLIC PREVIEW · FREE SIGN-IN FOR THE FULL PDF

French A subject report · May 2016

French ASubject report2016May 2016

Full PDFs are free with an email account.

Resource overview

This subject report is listed under French A in the 2016 examination archive. The catalogue session is May 2016. The information below helps you identify the document before opening the complete PDF. Subject, year and session labels come from the archive catalogue; the original cover remains the reference if a label differs. A file is not automatically suitable for your current syllabus simply because its subject name matches.

For coursework research, read this document as a reference rather than a template to submit. Notice how the question, evidence and explanation connect. If a paired commentary or subject report is available, compare it with the original work instead of assuming a polished essay received a particular mark. Historical examples may belong to an earlier assessment framework.

The public preview contains file information and, where reliable text extraction is available, a limited opening excerpt. It is not a summary of unseen questions or a replacement for the original document. Create a free email account to read or download the complete file. No payment is required to unlock this archive resource.

This original usage overview is based on the archive metadata. It does not claim to summarise the complete file.

Opening excerpt

Partial opening-page text only. Opening text only, limited to at most 20% of pages, two page-equivalents and 2,200 characters. Clearly labelled personal identifiers have been removed. Text extraction may omit equations, tables or figures.

May 2016 extended essay reports Page 1 Français A Seuil d’attribution des notes finales par matière Note finale : E D C B A Gamme de notes : 0-7 8-15 16-22 23-28 29-36 Variété et pertinence du travail présenté Variété certaine parmi les différents travaux ; ceux -ci sont généralement pertinents, dans la mesure où le candidat a suivi les consignes émises par le BI pour le mémoire. Augmentation de la quantité de mémoires de Catégorie 3 (études en langue). La présentation formelle, particulièrement, et la compréhension des consi gnes du BI pour ce mémoire varient d’un établissement à l’autre. Résultats des candidats par rapport à chaque critère D’une manière générale, la qualité des mémoires est assez bonne, avec certains mémoires de qualité exceptionnelle. Critère A : question de recherche L’apport et le soutien du superviseur quant au choix d’une question de recherche ciblée, qui correspond aux attentes exprimées par le BI pour ce mémoire, sont essentiels. Une question qui s’avère boiteuse a un impact sur le mémoire en entier. Cela dit, d’une manière générale, les questions de recherche sont bien ciblées. Critère B : introduction Les consignes du BI sont claires. L’introduction doit effectuer un lien avec les connaissances
File information
Subject
French A
Document type
Subject report
Year
2016
Session
May 2016
Level
Not labelled in the archive
Paper
Not labelled
Examination zone
Not labelled in the archive
Language
French
File size
69 KB
Pages
4
FREE FULL RESOURCE

Read the complete document.

Register or sign in with your email to unlock the full PDF. No payment, password or membership is needed.

View full documentDownload complete PDF

Your link is valid for five minutes. You can request another link after signing in.

Tell us what you need.
CONTACT IBVIA

Let’s talk about your work.

Your enquiry: IB support

Continue to WhatsApp with your selected service already included. Add your subject, deadline and current draft in the chat.

For your first message

What are you working on?