PUBLIC PREVIEW · FREE SIGN-IN FOR THE FULL PDF

Geography subject report · May 2012

GeographySubject report2012May 2012

Full PDFs are free with an email account.

Resource overview

This subject report is listed under Geography in the 2012 examination archive. The catalogue session is May 2012. The information below helps you identify the document before opening the complete PDF. Subject, year and session labels come from the archive catalogue; the original cover remains the reference if a label differs. A file is not automatically suitable for your current syllabus simply because its subject name matches.

For coursework research, read this document as a reference rather than a template to submit. Notice how the question, evidence and explanation connect. If a paired commentary or subject report is available, compare it with the original work instead of assuming a polished essay received a particular mark. Historical examples may belong to an earlier assessment framework.

The public preview contains file information and, where reliable text extraction is available, a limited opening excerpt. It is not a summary of unseen questions or a replacement for the original document. Create a free email account to read or download the complete file. No payment is required to unlock this archive resource.

This original usage overview is based on the archive metadata. It does not claim to summarise the complete file.

Opening excerpt

Partial opening-page text only. Opening text only, limited to at most 20% of pages, two page-equivalents and 2,200 characters. Clearly labelled personal identifiers have been removed. Text extraction may omit equations, tables or figures.

May 2012 extended essay reports Page 1 GEOGRAPHY Overall grade boundaries Grade: E D C B A Mark range: 0 - 7 8 - 15 16 - 22 23 - 28 29 - 36 The range and suitability of the work submitted The standard of essays submitted in geography was generally disappointing, with very few really outstanding essays. Many of the titles were very broad and conclusions were made on the basis of very little evidence, in some cases just a handful of interviews. There was a good range of titles and ideas, reflecting a worldwide candidature and differing interest areas. A large number of essays were written on a tourism theme (often these were not well done).Too many essays were submitted where candidates treated them as if they were fieldwork reports (IA). The style recommended for IA is NOT appropriate for extended essays. Weaker essays often had overly positive (and unrealistic) comments added to the inside cover by the essay’s supervisor, suggesting that some supervisors are unwilling or unable to be objective when discussing essay topics and methods wi th students. There are still some supervisors unwilling to write anything at all on the inside cover. On a more positive note, there was a good range of titles and ideas, reflecting a worldwide candidature and a wide range of interest areas . In addition, fewer essays this session had little or no relevance to geography. Candidate performance against each criterion Criterion A: research question Many essays were far too broad to answer in depth while remaining within the word limit. Choosing to investigate a broad RQ by looking at a limited number of specific hypotheses (which between them still leave important aspects of the original RQ unanswered) is NOT a good way to ensure that all aspects of a RQ are covered. For example research questions might invest igate the social, environmental and economic impacts of a geographic event when perhaps just one of these angles could have been investigated in depth. “Futuristic” questions looking at how a particular construction project
File information
Subject
Geography
Document type
Subject report
Year
2012
Session
May 2012
Level
Not labelled in the archive
Paper
Not labelled
Examination zone
Not labelled in the archive
Language
English
File size
74 KB
Pages
4
FREE FULL RESOURCE

Read the complete document.

Register or sign in with your email to unlock the full PDF. No payment, password or membership is needed.

View full documentDownload complete PDF

Your link is valid for five minutes. You can request another link after signing in.

Tell us what you need.
CONTACT IBVIA

Let’s talk about your work.

Your enquiry: IB support

Continue to WhatsApp with your selected service already included. Add your subject, deadline and current draft in the chat.

For your first message

What are you working on?