PUBLIC PREVIEW · FREE SIGN-IN FOR THE FULL PDF

Design Technology subject report · May 2012

Design TechnologySubject report2012May 2012

Full PDFs are free with an email account.

Resource overview

This subject report is listed under Design Technology in the 2012 examination archive. The catalogue session is May 2012. The information below helps you identify the document before opening the complete PDF. Subject, year and session labels come from the archive catalogue; the original cover remains the reference if a label differs. A file is not automatically suitable for your current syllabus simply because its subject name matches.

For coursework research, read this document as a reference rather than a template to submit. Notice how the question, evidence and explanation connect. If a paired commentary or subject report is available, compare it with the original work instead of assuming a polished essay received a particular mark. Historical examples may belong to an earlier assessment framework.

The public preview contains file information and, where reliable text extraction is available, a limited opening excerpt. It is not a summary of unseen questions or a replacement for the original document. Create a free email account to read or download the complete file. No payment is required to unlock this archive resource.

This original usage overview is based on the archive metadata. It does not claim to summarise the complete file.

Opening excerpt

Partial opening-page text only. Opening text only, limited to at most 20% of pages, two page-equivalents and 2,200 characters. Clearly labelled personal identifiers have been removed. Text extraction may omit equations, tables or figures.

May 2012 extended essay reports Page 1 DESIGN TECHNOLOGY Overall grade boundaries Grade: E D C B A Mark range: 0 - 7 8 - 15 16 - 22 23 - 28 29 - 36 The range and suitability of the work submitted The range and suitability of the work was mostly appropriate for the requirements of a design technology extended essay. As in previous years, the least successful essays were historical/developmental accounts of a technological subject e .g. an historical account of the development of mobile phones. Based on the essays seen there is a greater awareness and understanding of the nature of design technology as a discipline than in previous sessions. Candidate performance against each criterion Criterion A: research question It is important to ensure that the research question is not to o vague. In the most successful essays the RQ was clearly stated in the introductory stage of the essay. Some less successful essays had very specific research questions but the essay then focussed on general information e.g. an essay which starts out as an investiga tion on wind powered cars but then becomes an essay on generating energy from wind. Criterion B: introduction To score well in this criterion it is important to ensure that the introduction focuses on the context of the research question and does not beco me
File information
Subject
Design Technology
Document type
Subject report
Year
2012
Session
May 2012
Level
Not labelled in the archive
Paper
Not labelled
Examination zone
Not labelled in the archive
Language
English
File size
37 KB
Pages
3
FREE FULL RESOURCE

Read the complete document.

Register or sign in with your email to unlock the full PDF. No payment, password or membership is needed.

View full documentDownload complete PDF

Your link is valid for five minutes. You can request another link after signing in.

Tell us what you need.
CONTACT IBVIA

Let’s talk about your work.

Your enquiry: IB support

Continue to WhatsApp with your selected service already included. Add your subject, deadline and current draft in the chat.

For your first message

What are you working on?