This essay / exemplar is listed under Film in the 2015 examination archive. The catalogue session is May 2015. The information below helps you identify the document before opening the complete PDF. Subject, year and session labels come from the archive catalogue; the original cover remains the reference if a label differs. A file is not automatically suitable for your current syllabus simply because its subject name matches.
For coursework research, read this document as a reference rather than a template to submit. Notice how the question, evidence and explanation connect. If a paired commentary or subject report is available, compare it with the original work instead of assuming a polished essay received a particular mark. Historical examples may belong to an earlier assessment framework.
The public preview contains file information and, where reliable text extraction is available, a limited opening excerpt. It is not a summary of unseen questions or a replacement for the original document. Create a free email account to read or download the complete file. No payment is required to unlock this archive resource.
This original usage overview is based on the archive metadata. It does not claim to summarise the complete file.
Opening excerpt
Opening text only, limited to at most 20% of pages, two page-equivalents and 2,200 characters. Clearly labelled personal identifiers have been removed. Text extraction may omit equations, tables or figures.
then this cover and their final version extended
and whether it is group 1 or
Peterson
:_:::_.,·. ,_,_::_ ·:. -. \")_>(-_>· .... ·,: . .>:_'_::°::· ··:_-'./· ' . /_:: :·.·· . =)_\ ./ '-.:":_ .... -- __ · ·, . ', .
. ·· . Stlpervisot 1s t~pe>rt ~fld declarat ion
J:h; s3pervi;o(,r;u~f dompietethisreport, .. 1ign .the (leclaratton andtfien iiv~.ihe pna:1 ·tersion· ... ·of th€7
essay; with this coyerattachedt to the Diploma Programme coordinator. . . . . . . . ..
::,._,<_--\:-.·/· ... ":";":":--.-.. ·. ---- .. ,>'. ·.:,:.--: <>=·. ;:_ . . .. _-,..-_,--::,· .. :.
0
>>i:mi~ ~;!~;:91'.t~~~1TAt1.tte~) c
P1~,§.~p,rmmeht, ;J} a:,ir:lrapriate, on the candidate's perforrnance, .111e. 9q1Jtext ·;n •. w111ctrth~ .. cahdtdatei:m · ..
thft; J'e:~e,~rch.·forf fle ... ~X:tendfKI essay, anydifflcu/ties ef1COUntered anq ftCJW thes~\WfJ(fj ()VfJfCOfflf! ·(see .·
•tl1i! ext~nciede.ssay guide) .. The . cpncl(ldipg interview. (vive. vope),mt;}y P.fOvidtli.US$ftJf .informf.ltion:
pom1r1~nt~. can .flelp the ex:amr1er award. a ··tevetfot criterion K.th9lisJtcjudgrpentJ. po not. .comment
~pverse personal circumstan9~s that•· m$iiybave. aff.ected the candidate.\lftl'1e cr.rrtotJnt ottime.s piimt
qa;ndidate w~s zero, Jt04 must.explain tf1is, fn particular holft!1t was fhf;Jn ppssible .to ;;1.uthentic;at? the essa~
canciidaJe'sown work. You rnay a-ttachan .aclditfonal sherJtJf th.ere isinspfffpi*?nt f pr1ce here,·.···· ·
Overall, I think this paper is overambitious in its scope for the page length /
allowed . I ~elieve it requires furt_her_ editing, as the "making of" portion takes up too ~
large a portion of the essay leaving inadequate page space for reflections on theory and
social relevance. The section on the male gaze or the section on race relations in
comedy could have served as complete paper topics on their own (although I do
appreciate that they are there).
The student is a strong writer and researcher, however greater attention could
have been paid to organizational and critical approaches. I appreciated the anecdotes
sourced from different materials as I found they created a nice bridge between rigid
academic investigation and entertainment.
Overall,
File information
Subject
Film
Document type
Essay / exemplar
Year
2015
Session
May 2015
Level
Not labelled in the archive
Paper
Not labelled
Examination zone
Not labelled in the archive
Language
English
File size
1.0 MB
Pages
23
FREE FULL RESOURCE
Read the complete document.
Register or sign in with your email to unlock the full PDF. No payment, password or membership is needed.